Interdisciplinarity in Philosophy of Science

Marie I. Kaiser, Maria Kronfeldner*, Robert Meunier

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

This paper examines various ways in which philosophy of science can be interdisciplinary. It aims to provide a map of relations between philosophy and sciences, some of which are interdisciplinary. Such a map should also inform discussions concerning the question “How much philosophy is there in the philosophy of science?” In Sect. 1, we distinguish between synoptic and collaborative interdisciplinarity. With respect to the latter, we furthermore distinguish between two kinds of reflective forms of collaborative interdisciplinarity. We also briefly explicate how complexity triggers interdisciplinarity. In Sect. 2, we apply the distinctions of Sect. 1 to philosophy of science and analyze in which sense different styles of philosophy of science are interdisciplinary. The styles that we discuss are a synoptic-general, a reflective-general, a reflective-particular, a particular-embedded and a descriptive or normative style.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-70
Number of pages12
JournalJournal for General Philosophy of Science
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Collaboration
  • Complexity
  • Interdisciplinarity
  • Normativity
  • Philosophical styles
  • Reflective disciplines

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interdisciplinarity in Philosophy of Science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this