Intentional objects

Tim Crane*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

The idea of an intentional object, or an object of thought, gives rise to a dilemma for theories of intentionality. Either intentional objects are existing objects, in which case it is impossible, contrary to appearances, to think about something which does not exist. Or some intentional objects are non-existent real objects. But this requires an obscure and implausible metaphysics. I argue that the way out of this dilemma is to deny that being an intentional object is being an entity of any kind. 'Object' here does not mean thing or entity. Rather, to say that something is an intentional object is just to say that it is an object of thought (or other intentional state or act) for a subject. It is further argued that theories of intentionality should not dispense with the idea of an intentional object.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)336-349
Number of pages14
JournalRatio
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intentional objects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this