TY - JOUR
T1 - Institutions of Epistemic Vigilance
T2 - The Case of the Newspaper Press
AU - Szegőfi, Ákos
AU - Heintz, Christophe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Can people efficiently navigate the modern communication environment, and if yes, how? We hypothesize that in addition to psychological capacities of epistemic vigilance, which evaluate the epistemic value of communicated information, some social institutions have evolved for the same function. Certain newspapers for instance, implement processes, distributed among several experts and tools, whose function is to curate information. We analyze how information curation is done at the institutional level and what challenges it meets. We also investigate what factors favor the cultural evolution of institutions of epistemic vigilance: these include people’s preference for accurate and reliable information and their ability to assess communicated information in view of the source’s epistemic authority; but also contingent historical factors that make it worth–or not–to contribute to the maintenance of institutions of epistemic vigilance. We conclude the paper by considering the challenges and vulnerabilities of these institutions in the Digital Age.
AB - Can people efficiently navigate the modern communication environment, and if yes, how? We hypothesize that in addition to psychological capacities of epistemic vigilance, which evaluate the epistemic value of communicated information, some social institutions have evolved for the same function. Certain newspapers for instance, implement processes, distributed among several experts and tools, whose function is to curate information. We analyze how information curation is done at the institutional level and what challenges it meets. We also investigate what factors favor the cultural evolution of institutions of epistemic vigilance: these include people’s preference for accurate and reliable information and their ability to assess communicated information in view of the source’s epistemic authority; but also contingent historical factors that make it worth–or not–to contribute to the maintenance of institutions of epistemic vigilance. We conclude the paper by considering the challenges and vulnerabilities of these institutions in the Digital Age.
KW - Epistemic vigilance
KW - cultural epidemiology
KW - fake news
KW - journalism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136597886&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02691728.2022.2109532
DO - 10.1080/02691728.2022.2109532
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85136597886
SN - 0269-1728
VL - 36
SP - 613
EP - 628
JO - Social Epistemology
JF - Social Epistemology
IS - 5
ER -