TY - JOUR
T1 - Hungarian Asylum Law and Policy in 2015–2016
T2 - Securitization Instead of Loyal Cooperation
AU - Nagy, Boldizsár
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - The study describes Hungary’s policy towards asylum seekers and refugees in the tense period of 2015–2016 before and after the erection of fences at its southern borders of Hungary. It offers a theoretical explanation of the legal measures and practical actions. After briefly reviewing the factual basis, that is the magnitude of the movements and the number of decisions taken in the EU and in Hungary and the pertinent legal changes in 2015–2016 it elaborates the theoretical fundaments. Securitization majority identitarian populism and crimmigration are invoked as explanatory frames. The paper then reassembles the factual elements under six headings showing them in a new light. These are: denial, deterrence, obstruction, punishment, free riding constituting lack of solidarity and breaching the law (international, European, domestic). Finally the question is raised if all these moves are compatible with the duty of loyal co-operation of Member States with each-other and the EU as prescribed by article Article 4 (3) TEU.
AB - The study describes Hungary’s policy towards asylum seekers and refugees in the tense period of 2015–2016 before and after the erection of fences at its southern borders of Hungary. It offers a theoretical explanation of the legal measures and practical actions. After briefly reviewing the factual basis, that is the magnitude of the movements and the number of decisions taken in the EU and in Hungary and the pertinent legal changes in 2015–2016 it elaborates the theoretical fundaments. Securitization majority identitarian populism and crimmigration are invoked as explanatory frames. The paper then reassembles the factual elements under six headings showing them in a new light. These are: denial, deterrence, obstruction, punishment, free riding constituting lack of solidarity and breaching the law (international, European, domestic). Finally the question is raised if all these moves are compatible with the duty of loyal co-operation of Member States with each-other and the EU as prescribed by article Article 4 (3) TEU.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85151357872&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S2071832200021581
DO - 10.1017/S2071832200021581
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85151357872
SN - 2071-8322
VL - 17
SP - 1033
EP - 1082
JO - German Law Journal
JF - German Law Journal
IS - 6
ER -