TY - JOUR
T1 - Human-AI coevolution
AU - Pedreschi, Dino
AU - Pappalardo, Luca
AU - Ferragina, Emanuele
AU - Baeza-Yates, Ricardo
AU - Barabási, Albert László
AU - Dignum, Frank
AU - Dignum, Virginia
AU - Eliassi-Rad, Tina
AU - Giannotti, Fosca
AU - Kertész, János
AU - Knott, Alistair
AU - Ioannidis, Yannis
AU - Lukowicz, Paul
AU - Passarella, Andrea
AU - Pentland, Alex Sandy
AU - Shawe-Taylor, John
AU - Vespignani, Alessandro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - Human-AI coevolution, defined as a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other, increasingly characterises our society, but is understudied in artificial intelligence and complexity science literature. Recommender systems and assistants play a prominent role in human-AI coevolution, as they permeate many facets of daily life and influence human choices through online platforms. The interaction between users and AI results in a potentially endless feedback loop, wherein users' choices generate data to train AI models, which, in turn, shape subsequent user preferences. This human-AI feedback loop has peculiar characteristics compared to traditional human-machine interaction and gives rise to complex and often “unintended” systemic outcomes. This paper introduces human-AI coevolution as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science focused on the theoretical, empirical, and mathematical investigation of the human-AI feedback loop. In doing so, we: (i) outline the pros and cons of existing methodologies and highlight shortcomings and potential ways for capturing feedback loop mechanisms; (ii) propose a reflection at the intersection between complexity science, AI and society; (iii) provide real-world examples for different human-AI ecosystems; and (iv) illustrate challenges to the creation of such a field of study, conceptualising them at increasing levels of abstraction, i.e., scientific, legal and socio-political.
AB - Human-AI coevolution, defined as a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other, increasingly characterises our society, but is understudied in artificial intelligence and complexity science literature. Recommender systems and assistants play a prominent role in human-AI coevolution, as they permeate many facets of daily life and influence human choices through online platforms. The interaction between users and AI results in a potentially endless feedback loop, wherein users' choices generate data to train AI models, which, in turn, shape subsequent user preferences. This human-AI feedback loop has peculiar characteristics compared to traditional human-machine interaction and gives rise to complex and often “unintended” systemic outcomes. This paper introduces human-AI coevolution as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science focused on the theoretical, empirical, and mathematical investigation of the human-AI feedback loop. In doing so, we: (i) outline the pros and cons of existing methodologies and highlight shortcomings and potential ways for capturing feedback loop mechanisms; (ii) propose a reflection at the intersection between complexity science, AI and society; (iii) provide real-world examples for different human-AI ecosystems; and (iv) illustrate challenges to the creation of such a field of study, conceptualising them at increasing levels of abstraction, i.e., scientific, legal and socio-political.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Complex systems
KW - Computational social science
KW - Human-AI coevolution
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85209118417&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.artint.2024.104244
DO - 10.1016/j.artint.2024.104244
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85209118417
SN - 0004-3702
VL - 339
JO - Artificial Intelligence
JF - Artificial Intelligence
M1 - 104244
ER -