How minorities fare under referendums: A cross-national study

Daniel Bochsler*, Simon Hug

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

Referendums are often viewed as a threat to the rights of minorities. Empirical studies, so far, have tried to deal with the impact of referendums on minorities and civil rights at the subnational level by comparing either referendum or policy outcomes across subnational units. These units are, however, often constrained by the national level of government. Hence, to understand the full effect of referendums on minority policies, cross-national comparisons are required. Based on existing game-theoretical models, we argue that referendums and initiatives push policies towards the voters' preferences, either by protecting minority rights or reducing them. We test this proposition with national-level information on preferences and institutions as well as minority policies from countries spanning the whole globe.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)206-216
Number of pages11
JournalElectoral Studies
Volume38
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Civil rights
  • Indirect effects
  • Minority rights
  • Referendums

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How minorities fare under referendums: A cross-national study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this