TY - JOUR
T1 - Growing polarization around climate change on social media
AU - Falkenberg, Max
AU - Galeazzi, Alessandro
AU - Torricelli, Maddalena
AU - Di Marco, Niccolò
AU - Larosa, Francesca
AU - Sas, Madalina
AU - Mekacher, Amin
AU - Pearce, Warren
AU - Zollo, Fabiana
AU - Quattrociocchi, Walter
AU - Baronchelli, Andrea
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Climate change and political polarization are two of the twenty-first century’s critical socio-political issues. Here we investigate their intersection by studying the discussion around the United Nations Conference of the Parties on Climate Change (COP) using Twitter data from 2014 to 2021. First, we reveal a large increase in ideological polarization during COP26, following low polarization between COP20 and COP25. Second, we show that this increase is driven by growing right-wing activity, a fourfold increase since COP21 relative to pro-climate groups. Finally, we identify a broad range of ‘climate contrarian’ views during COP26, emphasizing the theme of political hypocrisy as a topic of cross-ideological appeal; contrarian views and accusations of hypocrisy have become key themes in the Twitter climate discussion since 2019. With future climate action reliant on negotiations at COP27 and beyond, our results highlight the importance of monitoring polarization and its impacts in the public climate discourse.
AB - Climate change and political polarization are two of the twenty-first century’s critical socio-political issues. Here we investigate their intersection by studying the discussion around the United Nations Conference of the Parties on Climate Change (COP) using Twitter data from 2014 to 2021. First, we reveal a large increase in ideological polarization during COP26, following low polarization between COP20 and COP25. Second, we show that this increase is driven by growing right-wing activity, a fourfold increase since COP21 relative to pro-climate groups. Finally, we identify a broad range of ‘climate contrarian’ views during COP26, emphasizing the theme of political hypocrisy as a topic of cross-ideological appeal; contrarian views and accusations of hypocrisy have become key themes in the Twitter climate discussion since 2019. With future climate action reliant on negotiations at COP27 and beyond, our results highlight the importance of monitoring polarization and its impacts in the public climate discourse.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142514247&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41558-022-01527-x
DO - 10.1038/s41558-022-01527-x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85142514247
SN - 1758-678X
VL - 12
SP - 1114
EP - 1121
JO - Nature Climate Change
JF - Nature Climate Change
IS - 12
ER -