Abstract (may include machine translation)
This study adopts a gendered lens to examine the impacts of human wildlife conflict (HWC) at Kakum Conservation Area, Ghana. Drawing upon feminist political ecology and using ethnographic techniques, we explore the unique ways in which men and women are differentially affected by HWC. Our results show that HWC compels men to migrate while women experience an intensified workload due to the absence of their spouses. Also, poaching has become a profitable and more appealing alternative due to crop-raiding. The prosecution of locals for unlawful park access and poaching has exacerbated social strife, disharmony, and hostility between residents and park authorities. Additionally, HWC incurs opportunity costs and undermines community cohesion by disrupting the livelihoods of farmers. Ultimately, the findings of this research are relevant in highlighting the need to prioritize gender issues in HWC; this is a crucial step in the development of measures and interventions that are socially inclusive.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Type | Article preprint |
| Media of output | Article preprint |
| Number of pages | 39 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 7 Jan 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Gendered Dimensions and Socio-Cultural Dynamics of Human-Wildlife Conflict: Insights from the Kakum Conservation Area, Ghana'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver