Abstract (may include machine translation)
We investigate costly yet futile attempts at self-control when consumption of a harmful product has a binary breakdown/no-breakdown nature and individuals tend to underestimate their need for self-control. Considering time-inconsistent preferences as well as temptation disutility, we show that becoming more sophisticated can decrease welfare and investigate what kind of mistaken beliefs lead to low welfare. With time-inconsistent preferences, being close to perfectly understanding one's preferences but assigning zero probability to true preferences induces the worst outcome.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 423-434 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Journal of the European Economic Association |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 2-3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2009 |
Externally published | Yes |