Former Yugoslavia: The security dilemma that never was?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

This article provides a critical examination of recent attempts by International Relations theorists to apply the security dilemma concept to the infra-state level to explain the outbreak of ethnic violence and war. It critiques the work of Barry Posen, Stuart Kaufman and Erik Melander. In doing so, the central claim of the article is that a specifically Butterfieldian interpretation of the concept is required if the security dilemma is to manifest its greatest explanatory value; where conflict between the parties involved is directly the product of misperception. It demonstrates how in failing to employ such a conception, Posen, Melander and Kaufman's work either completely neglects or fails to address satisfactorily what is arguably the essence of the security dilemma; what Butterfield came to describe as a 'tragedy'. The article thus concludes that the application of the concept in terms of the former Yugoslavia is for the most part untenable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)373-393
Number of pages21
JournalEuropean Journal of International Relations
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2000

Keywords

  • Benign intent
  • Former Yugoslavia
  • Misperception
  • Required insecurity
  • Security dilemma
  • Tragedy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Former Yugoslavia: The security dilemma that never was?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this