Force, content and the varieties of subject

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

This paper argues that to account for group speech acts, we should adopt a representationalist account of mode / force. Individual and collective subjects do not only represent what they e.g. assert or order. By asserting or ordering they also indicate their theoretical or practical positions towards what they assert or order. The ‘Frege point’ cannot establish the received dichotomy of force and propositional content. On the contrary, only the representationalist account allows a satisfactory response to it. It also allows us to give a more satisfactory analysis of the speech act of inviting a joint commitment and to answer two important questions Bernhard Schmid has raised about group speech acts, namely whether there are 1st person plural forms of Moore's paradox and of 1st person authority.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-129
Number of pages15
JournalLanguage and Communication
Volume69
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Collective intentionality
  • Group speech acts
  • Illocutionary force
  • Intentional content
  • Joint commitment
  • Propositions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Force, content and the varieties of subject'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this