TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining pathways for a climate neutral Europe by 2050; A model comparison analysis including integrated assessment models and energy system models
AU - Mikropoulos, Efstratios
AU - Roelfsema, Mark
AU - Chen, Hsing Hsuan
AU - Staffell, Iain
AU - Oreggioni, Gabriel
AU - Hdidouan, Dan
AU - Thellufsen, Jakob Zinck
AU - Chang, Miguel Antonio
AU - Fragkos, Panagiotis
AU - Giannousakis, Anastasis
AU - Chatterjee, Souran
AU - Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana
AU - Pfenninger, Stefan
AU - Pickering, Bryn
AU - Victoria, Marta
AU - Brown, Tom
AU - van Vuuren, Detlef P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/3/15
Y1 - 2025/3/15
N2 - The European Union's goal of achieving climate neutrality by 2050, outlined in the European Green Deal, is supported by numerous studies providing insights into pathways and emission reduction strategies in the energy sectors. However, model comparisons of such pathways are less common due to the complex nature of climate and energy modelling. Our study brings together integrated assessment models and energy system models under a common framework to develop EU policy scenarios: a Current Trends scenario reflecting existing policies and trends and a Climate Neutrality scenario aligned with the EU's emission reduction target. Both scenarios project reduced final energy consumption by 2050, driven by increased electrification and decreased fossil fuel usage. Electricity consumption increases driven by electrification despite the improved efficiency of electrified technologies. Models align on a shift toward renewables but diverge in technology and fuel choices, reflecting various approaches to reach net-zero energy systems. Furthermore, trade-offs between energy demand and supply mitigation strategies, as well as between renewable energy, e-fuels, and CCS technologies are identified. Considering these model variations, our study highlights the importance of consistent model comparison to offer reliable recommendations to policymakers and stakeholders. We conclude that model diversity is a valuable asset when used sensibly.
AB - The European Union's goal of achieving climate neutrality by 2050, outlined in the European Green Deal, is supported by numerous studies providing insights into pathways and emission reduction strategies in the energy sectors. However, model comparisons of such pathways are less common due to the complex nature of climate and energy modelling. Our study brings together integrated assessment models and energy system models under a common framework to develop EU policy scenarios: a Current Trends scenario reflecting existing policies and trends and a Climate Neutrality scenario aligned with the EU's emission reduction target. Both scenarios project reduced final energy consumption by 2050, driven by increased electrification and decreased fossil fuel usage. Electricity consumption increases driven by electrification despite the improved efficiency of electrified technologies. Models align on a shift toward renewables but diverge in technology and fuel choices, reflecting various approaches to reach net-zero energy systems. Furthermore, trade-offs between energy demand and supply mitigation strategies, as well as between renewable energy, e-fuels, and CCS technologies are identified. Considering these model variations, our study highlights the importance of consistent model comparison to offer reliable recommendations to policymakers and stakeholders. We conclude that model diversity is a valuable asset when used sensibly.
KW - CO2 net neutrality
KW - Current trends pathways
KW - Decarbonization pathways
KW - Energy system models
KW - European green deal
KW - Integrated assessment models
KW - Muti-model comparison
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217889910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.energy.2025.134809
DO - 10.1016/j.energy.2025.134809
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85217889910
SN - 0360-5442
VL - 319
JO - Energy
JF - Energy
M1 - 134809
ER -