Emergence of polarized opinions from free association networks

Bálint File*, Zsolt Keczer, Anna Vancsó, Beáta Bőthe, István Tóth-Király, Márton Hunyadi, Adrienn Ujhelyi, István Ulbert, Júlia Góth, Gábor Orosz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

We developed a method that can identify polarized public opinions by finding modules in a network of statistically related free word associations. Associations to the cue “migrant” were collected from two independent and comprehensive samples in Hungary (N1 = 505, N2 = 505). The co-occurrence-based relations of the free word associations reflected emotional similarity, and the modules of the association network were validated with well-established measures. The positive pole of the associations was gathered around the concept of “Refugees” who need help, whereas the negative pole associated asylum seekers with “Violence.” The results were relatively consistent in the two independent samples. We demonstrated that analyzing the modular organization of association networks can be a tool for identifying the most important dimensions of public opinion about a relevant social issue without using predefined constructs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)280-294
Number of pages15
JournalBehavior Research Methods
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Feb 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Association
  • Asylum seekers
  • Opinion network
  • Polarized opinions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Emergence of polarized opinions from free association networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this