Direito à Convivência Familiar e Separação Compulsória: Discriminação e Estereótipos no caso Mães Órfãs de Belo Horizonte à luz dos Marcos Normativos Internacionais e Nacionais

Translated title of the contribution: Right to Family Life and Child Removal: Stereotypes and Discrimination in the Mães Órfãs case of Belo Horizonte, Brazil, in the light of International and National Legal Frameworks

Juliana Cesario Alvim Gomes, Clara Viana Lage Meirelles, Daniella Monteiro de Lima Borges

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

The article examines the mismatch between child protection and family coexistence norms and their application in Brazil, where the compulsory separation of babies from their families is trivialized through the discriminatory application of the law and the use of gender, race, and class stereotypes. It provides an overview of international and national human rights protection systems and analyzes the case of the Mães Órfãs (“Orphaned Mothers”) of the city of Belo Horizonte. It highlights how non-conforming characteristics and marginalization conditions justify judicial decisions that promote the separation of children from their families and how these decisions reinforce stereotypes, perpetuate inequalities, and hold vulnerable women accountable for structural issues, presuming risk and incapacity for motherhood, violating their rights and those of their children.
Translated title of the contributionRight to Family Life and Child Removal: Stereotypes and Discrimination in the Mães Órfãs case of Belo Horizonte, Brazil, in the light of International and National Legal Frameworks
Original languagePortuguese
JournalRevista Brasileira De Direitos Fundamentais & Justiça
Volume23
Issue number52
StatePublished - 2025
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Right to Family Life and Child Removal: Stereotypes and Discrimination in the Mães Órfãs case of Belo Horizonte, Brazil, in the light of International and National Legal Frameworks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this