Abstract (may include machine translation)
Thanks to research conducted in the past few years, our understanding has been significantly expanded concerning democracy and authoritarian regimes, as well as the means of both destroying and rebuilding democratic institutions. While there is a clear link between a developed economy and democracy, the relationship is not self-evident in all cases. Also, economic growth is not conducive to the development of democracy under all circumstances, especially when the distribution of wealth is not considered fair by all citizens. In and of itself an election, even a competitive one - long considered a democratic minimum - does not guarantee the survival of a democracy, as strongmen have learned how to run an authoritarian system behind an electoral veil. The majority of autocratic leaders use the concept of democracy as a screen for building a political regime antithetical to the spirit and practice of a real democracy. Autocrats adopt a number of democratic institutions only to subvert their original purposes. While they pose as democrats, instead of a liberal democracy they initially organize a majoritarian democracy, followed by an illiberal democracy that ignores human rights. This is but one step away from an autocratic turning point, the rejection of all democratic principles. Potemkin democracies may even hold (limited) open elections organized so that the outcome will not threaten the foundations of the existing regime.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 841-851 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Perspectives on Politics |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2013 |