Abstract (may include machine translation)
This article addresses the promotion of democracy in the enlargement process of the central and eastern European countries (CEECs). We start by outlining EU democracy promotion during accession, with a particular focus on political conditionality. In a subsequent part, we argue that the European Commission did not make a clear substantive distinction between the concepts of rule of law and democracy. In addition, various drawbacks are identified, which demonstrate the vagueness and inconsistencies that characterize the EU's application of democratic conditionality. A final part illustrates these points by focusing on the EU's democratic conditionality towards the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The conclusion reads that the EU did not have a well-defined view and approach to the promotion of democracy and the rule of law in the eastern enlargement.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 589-605 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | European Foreign Affairs Review |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Democratic conditionality in the Eastern enlargement: Ambitious window dressing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver