Democracy, Authoritarianism and Global Economic Governance

Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article reviewpeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

Four weeks after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, US Senator John Kennedy accused the Biden administration of indirectly providing over $17 billion to Moscow as Putin was gearing up for war. In August 2021, the International Monetary Fund had indeed approved a historic $650 billion allocation of Special Drawing Rights to help member countries struggling with the Covid crisis. Russia benefited from these money transfers, as did Iran, China, and Myanmar, notwithstanding the authoritarian consolidation of these regimes. Kennedy's op-ed sparked a debate about the lack of transparency in the use of crisis resources and led to the adoption in the United States of the ‘Russia and Belarus SDR Exchange Prohibition Act’, which bans currency transactions with these countries through the IMF, following the imposition of 2,500 sanctions by the US Treasury since February 2022. The op-ed also reignited a decades-old debate over whether international organisations such as the IMF, World Bank and World Trade Organisation (WTO) should be held accountable for supporting authoritarian and corrupt governments or interfering in the politics of sovereign nations.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages12
JournalContemporary European History
DOIs
StatePublished - 9 Jan 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Democracy, Authoritarianism and Global Economic Governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this