Defining key concepts for mental state attribution

Francois Quesque, Ian Apperly, Renee Baillargeon, Simon Baron-Cohen, Cristina Becchio, Harold Bekkering, Daniel Bernstein, Maxime Bertoux, Geoffrey Bird, Henryk Bukowski, Pascal Burgmer, Peter Carruthers, Caroline Catmur, Isabel Dziobek, Nicholas Epley, Thorsten Michael Erle, Chris Frith, Uta Frith, Carl Michael Galang, Vittorio GalleseDelphine Grynberg, Francesca Happe, Masahiro Hirai, Sara D. Hodges, Philipp Kanske, Mariska Kret, Claus Lamm, Jean Louis Nandrino, Sukhvinder Obhi, Sally Olderbak, Josef Perner, Yves Rossetti, Dana Schneider, Matthias Schurz, Tobias Schuwerk, Natalie Sebanz, Simone Shamay-Tsoory, Giorgia Silani, Shannon Spaulding, Andrew R. Todd, Evan Westra, Dan Zahavi, Marcel Brass

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract (may include machine translation)

The terminology used in discussions on mental state attribution is extensive and lacks consistency. In the current paper, experts from various disciplines collaborate to introduce a shared set of concepts and make recommendations regarding future use.

Original languageEnglish
Article number29
Number of pages5
JournalCommunications Psychology
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 Apr 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Defining key concepts for mental state attribution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this