Abstract (may include machine translation)
The paper analyses the new architecture of global governance which is characterised by unaccountable international institutions and scattered sovereignties. It examines the dilemmas of civil society actors (social movements and NGOs) involved in protecting the rights of local communities through strategic issue-based alliances with the state or the World Bank, whose legitimacy they question in other contexts. The cunning state remains a central actor in selectively transposing neoliberal policies to the national terrain and capitalises on its perceived weakness in order to render itself unaccountable to its citizens. The argument draws on empirical material from India around conflicts over the patenting of genetic resources, biodiversity conservation, forced displacement and privatisation of common property resources.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 27-60 |
| Number of pages | 34 |
| Journal | Archives Europeennes de Sociologie |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2003 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cunning states and unaccountable international institutions: Legal plurality, social movements and rights of local communities to common property resources'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver