Abstract (may include machine translation)
This article examines crisis corporatism during the COVID-19 pandemic in Türkiye and Serbia. It focuses on how institutional power relations shaped policy responses for vulnerable groups in the labour market. These countries are semi-peripheral economies with weak corporatist traditions and centralised administration, but they diverge significantly with regard to labour relations. Türkiye’s crisis management was top-down with limited social partner input, and social policy measures tended to exacerbate existing inequalities. Serbia combined executive dominance with selective post hoc consultation, resulting in broader social protection through universal cash transfers and job subsidies. Our findings indicate that institutionalised social dialogue is crucial for inclusive crisis policy-making. Serbia’s modest engagement with social partners led to more effective support for vulnerable workers. The article underscores the centrality of institutionalised power relations in shaping corporatist responses during crises and calls for structurally embedded social dialogue to ensure equitable policy outcomes in future systemic shocks.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 313-329 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 25 Oct 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
Keywords
- Crisis corporatism
- Serbia
- Türkiye
- institutionalised power relations
- pandemic
- social partners
- vulnerable groups
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Crisis corporatism under strain: institutional power and the protection of vulnerable groups in Türkiye and Serbia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver