TY - CHAP
T1 - Crises of Authoritarian Financialization
T2 - Monetary Policy in Hungary and Türkiye in the Polycrisis
AU - Karas, D.
AU - Dönmez, P.E.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - We identify in this chapter the contradictory objectives of monetary policy under an authoritarian mode of financialization (AF) in Emerging Market Economies (EMEs) where the executive branch intervenes directly in monetary policy, banking supervision and retail banking. We interpret AF as a statist-authoritarian attempt to manage the vulnerabilities of growth strategies under subordinate financialization: following Marxist theories of the state, we argue that instead of providing political-economic stabilization, statist authoritarianism merely internalizes class conflicts within the state apparatus spurring accumulation and legitimation dilemmas for the state. We illustrate two divergent crisis trajectories of AF in Hungary and Türkiye in the 2020–22 period by showing how executive centralization fails to solve the increasingly contradictory objectives of stabilizing sovereign and private debt markets. Instead, we observe enhanced incoherence in monetary policy and a diminishing capacity of AF regimes to shore up rentier social contracts. Although both cases face accumulation and legitimation dilemmas in 2022, we explain the consolidation of inflationary and disinflationary monetary policies with differences in debt profiles, social blocs, and external financing conditions.
AB - We identify in this chapter the contradictory objectives of monetary policy under an authoritarian mode of financialization (AF) in Emerging Market Economies (EMEs) where the executive branch intervenes directly in monetary policy, banking supervision and retail banking. We interpret AF as a statist-authoritarian attempt to manage the vulnerabilities of growth strategies under subordinate financialization: following Marxist theories of the state, we argue that instead of providing political-economic stabilization, statist authoritarianism merely internalizes class conflicts within the state apparatus spurring accumulation and legitimation dilemmas for the state. We illustrate two divergent crisis trajectories of AF in Hungary and Türkiye in the 2020–22 period by showing how executive centralization fails to solve the increasingly contradictory objectives of stabilizing sovereign and private debt markets. Instead, we observe enhanced incoherence in monetary policy and a diminishing capacity of AF regimes to shore up rentier social contracts. Although both cases face accumulation and legitimation dilemmas in 2022, we explain the consolidation of inflationary and disinflationary monetary policies with differences in debt profiles, social blocs, and external financing conditions.
UR - https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003323280-12/crises-authoritarian-financialization-monetary-policy-hungary-t%C3%BCrkiye-polycrisis-david-karas-pinar-d%C3%B6nmez?context=ubx&refId=c06339f5-75e6-466a-8ab5-5219b8cfbb79
UR - https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003323280
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85168893561&doi=10.4324%2f9781003323280-12&partnerID=40&md5=75268712ea69a993bcfbcc4c3ab72840
M3 - Chapter
SP - 186
EP - 220
BT - Central Banking in a Post-Pandemic World
ER -