Abstract (may include machine translation)
A modernisation- and individualisation-induced loss of trust, membership, and voters has been addressed in party research for a while. However, social theory authors such as Beck, Bauman, Sennett, and Taylor have pointed to further organisational dilemmas that have not been addressed in depth: That demands for flexibility, individualisation and non-bindingness and demands for centralized political leadership might go hand in hand; and that notwithstanding increasing individualisation citizens might demand new forms of social collectives and belonging. In this article, I compare how different established party families perceive these contradictions and seek to create new party-society linkages. Based on a series of qualitative in-depth interviews with social democratic and conservative party functionaries, I emphasise that different party families and their reform attempts reflect individualisation, flexible and liquid identities differently and thus refashion the way citizens are linked with political parties and representative democracy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 217-227 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Party Politics |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2025 |
Keywords
- conservatism
- individualisation
- party reforms
- social democracy
- social movements