Abstract (may include machine translation)
In the present article we exploit the logical notions of correctness and completeness to provide an analysis of some fundamental problems that can be encountered by a software developer when transforming norms for traffic circulation into programming instructions. Relying on this analysis, we then introduce a question and answer procedure that can be helpful, in case of an accident, to clarify which components of an existing framework should be revised and to what extent software developers can be held responsible.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 72 |
| Journal | Science and Engineering Ethics |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Autonomous vehicles
- Encoding rules
- Framework revision
- Question and answer procedure
- Responsibility
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Correctness and Completeness of Programming Instructions for Traffic Circulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver