Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Conclusion: Towards a ‘deep debate’ on the anthropocene

  • Thomas Hickmann
  • , Lena Partzsch
  • , Philipp Pattberg
  • , Sabine Weiland
  • University of Potsdam
  • University of Freiburg
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Université catholique de Lille

Research output: Contribution to Book/Report types › Chapter › peer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

This conclusion presents some closing thoughts on the concepts covered in the preceding chapters of this book. The book provides rich insights into the question of what the contributions of a political science perspective to the Anthropocene debate could be. It describes the Anthropocene as a scientific description of ongoing Earth system transformations. The book outlines the dichotomisation of the scientific descriptions of the Anthropocene as 'crisis' or 'opportunity' which opens up the different normative logics underpinning the representations and enables scrutiny of the complex co-constitution of scientific and normative statements. It focuses on the relationship between the concept of governance and the Anthropocene and demonstrates that the Anthropocene invokes a co-evolutionary, transformation-oriented and temporally extended understanding of governance. The book analyses how the field of security studies has dealt with the concept of the Anthropocene and discusses the contribution of environmental security studies to the Anthropocene debate.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Anthropocene Debate and Political Science
EditorsThomas Hickmann, Lena Partzsch, Philipp Pattberg, Sabine Weiland
PublisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Pages237-251
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9781351174121
ISBN (Print)9780815386148
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameRoutledge Research in Global Environmental Governance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conclusion: Towards a ‘deep debate’ on the anthropocene'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this