Comparing in global times: Between extension and incorporation

Judit Bodnár*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

Globalization has complicated comparative research. What I call the connective and the integrative moments of globalization influence the comparative gesture differently; while one erodes the boundaries of the case, that is, of the empirical core of comparative research, the other makes comparison theoretically more plausible. Drawing on the heterogeneous epistemologies and histories of disciplines, which ultimately underlie passions for or against comparison, these two moments foster different intellectual endeavors—transnational and global approaches—of-ten set up in opposition. I propose a more synthetic framework of oscillating comparison, which draws equally on the connective and integrative aspects of globalization, engaging the corresponding critical insights in a more productive dialogue. The article outlines a composite strategy that oscillates between different levels and forms of comparison and merges into an overarching framework the transnational approach (through case extension) and the global approach (through incorporated comparison) while expanding the practice of comparative research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-32
Number of pages32
JournalCritical Historical Studies
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing in global times: Between extension and incorporation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this