Civil Society, Institutional Change and the Politics of Reform. The Great Transition

László Bruszt, Campos Nauro, Fidrmuc Jan, Roland Gérárd

Research output: Contribution to Book/Report typesChapterpeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

Nearly two decades after the start of economic and political reforms in the former communist countries, the economic and political outcomes are very diverse. On the one hand, the countries of Central Europe and the Baltics were able, for the most part, to stabilize their economies after a few years of output fall and to recover their pre-1989 output levels. On the other hand, the former Soviet Union (FSU) and former Yugoslavia (with the exception of Slovenia) experienced a much more severe and protracted output drop and, subsequently, also slower recovery (Figure 8.1). Furthermore, market reforms were faster and deeper in the former group of countries while the countries of the FSU lagged behind (EBRD 2007; Kaufmann et al. 2003). The progress with respect to political liberalization was similar. Some post-communist countries, again mostly those in Central Europe and the Baltics, quickly introduced free elections and political freedoms, and stabilized their democracies. In contrast, former Yugoslavia went through a horrible war experience before any substantial democratization could be observed, while most countries of the FSU underwent a period of limited democratization before drifting towards autocratic rule (Figure 8.2).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEconomies in transition : the long-run view
Place of PublicationHoundmills in Basingstoke
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages194-221
Number of pages28
ISBN (Print)9780230343481
StatePublished - 2012

Publication series

NameStudies in development economics and policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Civil Society, Institutional Change and the Politics of Reform. The Great Transition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this