Can Voters Be Equal? A Cross-national Analysis Part 2

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

The paper empirically tests the proposition that because of the unequal social distribution of politically relevant resources, some groups of citizens may be less successful in expressing their specifically political preferences in the vote than others. Hence, the electoral arena may give different people different degrees of political influence even when the formal equality of all citizens before the law is rigorously upheld in the electoral process. The first part of the paper (published in the previous issue of this journal) explored the assumptions behind the proposition itself and the further assumptions that need to be made in order to test it empirically. The second part of the paper offers an empirical test. Survey data on voting behavior in 18 democratic party systems from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems and Larry Bartels’s (1996) simulation procedure – now extended to the analysis of multiparty-systems, turnout effects and non-linear information effects on the vote – are utilized to explore the question. The results show that social differences in both turnout and political knowledge may lead to the hypothesized political inequalities but their size is remarkably modest.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-65
Number of pages19
JournalReview of Sociology of the Hungarian Sociological Association
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can Voters Be Equal? A Cross-national Analysis Part 2'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this