Can a voluntary web survey be useful beyond explorative research?

Brian Fabo*, Martin Kahanec

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

In this paper, we compare the estimates of earnings determinants based on the non-probabilistic WageIndicator web survey with those based on the widely used, representative EU Study of Income and Living Conditions survey. Using 10 years of Dutch data, we show that there exists an established segment of predominantly junior workers from which the respondents of the WageIndicator survey are disproportionally drawn. In consequence, the composition of WageIndicator sample tends to retain key characteristics over the years, even though it lacks a probabilistic sampling frame. We show that the estimates produced on the basis of an extended Mincerian earnings model using the two data sources are qualitatively similar. In line with much of the literature, however, the two sets of estimates do not pass the formal statistical test of equality. Nonetheless, when we examine only the subsample of junior workers, the statistical testing does not detect a statistically significant difference between the two datasets in many instances. To our knowledge, ours is the first paper showing such statistical evidence for comparability of a web survey based with a widely used representative data source.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)591-601
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Sep 2018

Keywords

  • Voluntary survey
  • WageIndicator
  • data quality
  • web survey

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can a voluntary web survey be useful beyond explorative research?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this