Abstract (may include machine translation)
This chapter critiques the EU's response to rule of law backsliding in Member States, arguing that it has led to an expansion of supranational powers but without meaningful impact. Despite its potential, this ‘constitutional revolution’ has been undermined by increased politicization, where decisions are dictated by political expediency rather than robust legal principles. The resulting double standards have weakened the EU's rule of law framework, as fundamental principles, such as judicial independence and adherence to human rights guarantees, are inconsistently applied at the national and supranational levels. It is argued that the EU's interventions not only fail to resolve the issues they target but also erode the Union's legal coherence and credibility. By politicising the rule of law, the EU has diminished its capacity to temper power effectively, thereby weakening both Member States and the Union itself. This shift risks enabling lawlessness while undermining the EU's foundational legal principles.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Sustaining the Rule of Law |
| Subtitle of host publication | The Future of Judicial Independence in Europe |
| Editors | Petra Bárd, Jasper Krommendijk |
| Publisher | Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. |
| Pages | 185-204 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781035345472 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781035345465 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 21 Oct 2025 |
Keywords
- Accountability
- Double standards
- Judicial independence
- Legal coherence
- Rule of law backsliding
- Supranational opportunism
- Supremacy vs