Abstract (may include machine translation)
Common-sense morality and legislations around the world ascribe normative relevance to biological connections between parents and children. Procreators who meet a modest standard of parental competence are believed to have a right to rear the children whom they brought into the world. I explore various attempts to justify this belief, and find most of these attempts lacking. I distinguish between two kinds of biological connection between parents and children: the genetic link and the gestational link. I argue that the second can better justify a right to rear.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 225-240 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Australasian Journal of Philosophy |
| Volume | 96 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 3 Apr 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- children's rights
- gestation genetics
- procreation
- right to parent