Assessing ESA on What It Is Designed for: A Reply to Cooper and Glaesser

Carsten Q. Schneider^*, Claudius Wagemann

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review Article › peer-review

Access to Document

@article{a7e3124cad98471c8cdfb7d785a891b4,

title = "Assessing ESA on What It Is Designed for: A Reply to Cooper and Glaesser",

author = "Schneider, \{Carsten Q.\} and Claudius Wagemann",

year = "2016",

month = aug,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/1525822X15598977",

language = "English",

volume = "28",

pages = "316--321",

journal = "Field Methods",

issn = "1525-822X",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing ESA on What It Is Designed for

T2 - A Reply to Cooper and Glaesser

AU - Schneider, Carsten Q.

AU - Wagemann, Claudius

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84978049881

U2 - 10.1177/1525822X15598977

DO - 10.1177/1525822X15598977

M3 - Review Article

AN - SCOPUS:84978049881

SN - 1525-822X

VL - 28

SP - 316

EP - 321

JO - Field Methods

JF - Field Methods

IS - 3

ER -