Anti-COVID = Anti-science? How protesters against COVID-19 measures appropriate science to navigate the information environment

Anna Berg*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

Opponents of COVID-19 measures invoke science in curious ways: they collect data, cite scientific studies, and even conduct their own research projects. Previous research has explained these scientific appropriations as the product of motivated reasoning, the result of widespread disinformation, or a populist strategy. This study provides a further explanation by focusing on these scientific projects. Drawing from repeated interviews with a select group of 36 anti-lockdown protesters in Germany, I find that my interviewees draw on scientific repertoires in order to overcome information insecurities triggered by their discovery of online countermedia. Although the results of their scientific efforts often remain inconclusive, through the process of doing research, protesters achieve a reorientation in the information environment and begin to rely on countermedia as a source of information and political opinion. Based on these findings, I argue that protesters refer to the sciences as a conversion technique.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNew Media & Society
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anti-intellectualism
  • anti-lockdown
  • anti-science
  • confirmation bias
  • conspiracy theories
  • counter knowledge
  • countermedia
  • COVID-19 protests
  • disinformation
  • populism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anti-COVID = Anti-science? How protesters against COVID-19 measures appropriate science to navigate the information environment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this