TY - JOUR
T1 - An option space approach to wood use
T2 - Providing structural timber for buildings while safeguarding forest integrity
AU - Gingrich, Simone
AU - Matej, Sarah
AU - Erb, Karl Heinz
AU - Haberl, Helmut
AU - Le Noë, Julia
AU - Kaufmann, Lisa
AU - Magerl, Andreas
AU - Schaffartzik, Anke
AU - Wiedenhofer, Dominik
AU - Pauliuk, Stefan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/10/17
Y1 - 2025/10/17
N2 - Wood use is crucial for climate-change mitigation, but strategies range from increasing harvest to conserving forests. To reconcile contradictions, we conceptualize an option space that considers both social and ecological thresholds. We couple the material flow model RECC and the forest model CRAFT to quantify the option space for wood use in the global building sector and current forest areas from 2020 to 2050. We juxtapose four demand scenarios with four supply scenarios that meet material and ecosystem service thresholds, respectively. In 12 of the 16 resulting scenario combinations, supply exceeds demand. They differ in regional self-sufficiency (6–9 out of ten world regions), average primary wood availability beyond structural timber use (0.2–1.4 GtCyr−1), and overall climate impacts (2.0–8.0 GtCO2eqyr−1). Substantially increasing wood intensity in buildings within ecological limits is only feasible in a low floorspace scenario with increasing circularity, emphasizing the need for nuance in claims regarding the sustainability of wood use.
AB - Wood use is crucial for climate-change mitigation, but strategies range from increasing harvest to conserving forests. To reconcile contradictions, we conceptualize an option space that considers both social and ecological thresholds. We couple the material flow model RECC and the forest model CRAFT to quantify the option space for wood use in the global building sector and current forest areas from 2020 to 2050. We juxtapose four demand scenarios with four supply scenarios that meet material and ecosystem service thresholds, respectively. In 12 of the 16 resulting scenario combinations, supply exceeds demand. They differ in regional self-sufficiency (6–9 out of ten world regions), average primary wood availability beyond structural timber use (0.2–1.4 GtCyr−1), and overall climate impacts (2.0–8.0 GtCO2eqyr−1). Substantially increasing wood intensity in buildings within ecological limits is only feasible in a low floorspace scenario with increasing circularity, emphasizing the need for nuance in claims regarding the sustainability of wood use.
KW - Earth sciences
KW - Environmental management
KW - Environmental policy
KW - Environmental science
KW - Forestry
KW - Global change
KW - Natural resources
KW - Nature conservation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015409032
U2 - 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113472
DO - 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113472
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105015409032
SN - 2589-0042
VL - 28
JO - iScience
JF - iScience
IS - 10
M1 - 113472
ER -