Abstract (may include machine translation)
This paper provides a detailed critical analysis of the case of Coman, where the Court of Justice clarified that the meaning of the term ‘spouse’ in Directive 2004/38 was gender-neutral, opening up the door for same-sex marriage recognition for immigration purposes all around the EU, thus destroying the heteronormative misinterpretations of the clear language of the Directive practised in a handful of Member States. The state of EU law after Coman is still far from perfect, however: we underline a line of important questions which remain open and which the Court will need to turn to in the near future to ensure that marriage equality moves beyond mere proclamations in the whole territory of the Union.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 549-572 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Coman
- EU law
- marriage equality
- non-discrimination
- same-sex marriage
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'After the celebration: Marriage equality in EU Law post-Coman in eight questions and some further thoughts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver