Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Active labour market policy evaluations: A meta-analysis

  • David Card*
  • , Jochen Kluve
  • , Andrea Weber
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of California at Berkeley
  • Leibniz Institute for Economic Research
  • University of Mannheim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

This article presents a meta-analysis of recent microeconometric evaluations of active labour market policies. We categorise 199 programme impacts from 97 studies conducted between 1995 and 2007. Job search assistance programmes yield relatively favourable programme impacts, whereas public sector employment programmes are less effective. Training programmes are associated with positive medium-term impacts, although in the short term they often appear ineffective. We also find that the outcome variable used to measure programme impact matters, but neither the publication status of a study nor the use of a randomised design is related to the sign or significance of the programme estimate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)F452-F477
JournalEconomic Journal
Volume120
Issue number548
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2010
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Active labour market policy evaluations: A meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this