A Unifying Framework for Causal Analysis in Set-Theoretic Multimethod Research

Ingo Rohlfing*, Carsten Q. Schneider

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract (may include machine translation)

    The combination of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) with process tracing, which we call set-theoretic multimethod research (MMR), is steadily becoming more popular in empirical research. Despite the fact that both methods have an elected affinity based on set theory, it is not obvious how a within-case method operating in a single case and a cross-case method operating on a population of cases are compatible and can be combined in empirical research. There is a need to reflect on whether and how set-theoretic MMR is internally coherent and how QCA and process tracing can be integrated in causal analysis. We develop a unifying foundation for causal analysis in set-theoretic MMR that highlights the roles and interplay of QCA and process tracing. We argue that causal inference via counterfactuals on the level of single cases integrates QCA and process tracing and assigns proper and equally valuable roles to both methods.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)37-63
    Number of pages27
    JournalSociological Methods and Research
    Volume47
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1 Jan 2018

    Keywords

    • Qualitative Comparative Analysis
    • causal explanation
    • causal inference
    • causal mechanisms
    • counterfactuals
    • mixed methods
    • process tracing

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A Unifying Framework for Causal Analysis in Set-Theoretic Multimethod Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this