Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: Synthesizing the insights

  • Helmut Haberl
  • , Dominik Wiedenhofer
  • , Doris Virág
  • , Gerald Kalt
  • , Barbara Plank
  • , Paul Brockway
  • , Tomer Fishman
  • , Daniel Hausknost
  • , Fridolin Krausmann
  • , Bartholomaüs Leon-Gruchalski
  • , Andreas Mayer
  • , Melanie Pichler
  • , Anke Schaffartzik
  • , Tânia Sousa
  • , Jan Streeck
  • , Felix Creutzig
  • University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
  • University of Leeds
  • School of Sustainability, Reichman University
  • Vienna University of Economics and Business
  • Autonomous University of Barcelona
  • University of Lisbon
  • Mercator Institute for the Global Commons (MCC)

Research output: Contribution to journalReview Articlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

Strategies toward ambitious climate targets usually rely on the concept of 'decoupling'; that is, they aim at promoting economic growth while reducing the use of natural resources and GHG emissions. GDP growth coinciding with absolute reductions in emissions or resource use is denoted as 'absolute decoupling', as opposed to 'relative decoupling', where resource use or emissions increase less so than does GDP. Based on the bibliometric mapping in part I (Wiedenhofer et al, 2020 Environ. Res. Lett. 15 063002), we synthesize the evidence emerging from the selected 835 peer-reviewed articles. We evaluate empirical studies of decoupling related to final/useful energy, exergy, use of material resources, as well as CO2 and total GHG emissions. We find that relative decoupling is frequent for material use as well as GHG and CO2 emissions but not for useful exergy, a quality-based measure of energy use. Primary energy can be decoupled from GDP largely to the extent to which the conversion of primary energy to useful exergy is improved. Examples of absolute long-term decoupling are rare, but recently some industrialized countries have decoupled GDP from both production- A nd, weaklier, consumption-based CO2 emissions. We analyze policies or strategies in the decoupling literature by classifying them into three groups: (1) Green growth, if sufficient reductions of resource use or emissions were deemed possible without altering the growth trajectory. (2) Degrowth, if reductions of resource use or emissions were given priority over GDP growth. (3) Others, e.g. if the role of energy for GDP growth was analyzed without reference to climate change mitigation. We conclude that large rapid absolute reductions of resource use and GHG emissions cannot be achieved through observed decoupling rates, hence decoupling needs to be complemented by sufficiency-oriented strategies and strict enforcement of absolute reduction targets. More research is needed on interdependencies between wellbeing, resources and emissions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number065003
Number of pages42
JournalEnvironmental Research Letters
Volume15
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2020
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  3. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  4. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  5. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • GHG emissions
  • decoupling
  • degrowth
  • economic growth
  • energy
  • exergy
  • material flow

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: Synthesizing the insights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this