TY - JOUR
T1 - A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions
T2 - part II: Synthesizing the insights
AU - Haberl, Helmut
AU - Wiedenhofer, Dominik
AU - Virág, Doris
AU - Kalt, Gerald
AU - Plank, Barbara
AU - Brockway, Paul
AU - Fishman, Tomer
AU - Hausknost, Daniel
AU - Krausmann, Fridolin
AU - Leon-Gruchalski, Bartholomaüs
AU - Mayer, Andreas
AU - Pichler, Melanie
AU - Schaffartzik, Anke
AU - Sousa, Tânia
AU - Streeck, Jan
AU - Creutzig, Felix
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - Strategies toward ambitious climate targets usually rely on the concept of 'decoupling'; that is, they aim at promoting economic growth while reducing the use of natural resources and GHG emissions. GDP growth coinciding with absolute reductions in emissions or resource use is denoted as 'absolute decoupling', as opposed to 'relative decoupling', where resource use or emissions increase less so than does GDP. Based on the bibliometric mapping in part I (Wiedenhofer et al, 2020 Environ. Res. Lett. 15 063002), we synthesize the evidence emerging from the selected 835 peer-reviewed articles. We evaluate empirical studies of decoupling related to final/useful energy, exergy, use of material resources, as well as CO2 and total GHG emissions. We find that relative decoupling is frequent for material use as well as GHG and CO2 emissions but not for useful exergy, a quality-based measure of energy use. Primary energy can be decoupled from GDP largely to the extent to which the conversion of primary energy to useful exergy is improved. Examples of absolute long-term decoupling are rare, but recently some industrialized countries have decoupled GDP from both production- A nd, weaklier, consumption-based CO2 emissions. We analyze policies or strategies in the decoupling literature by classifying them into three groups: (1) Green growth, if sufficient reductions of resource use or emissions were deemed possible without altering the growth trajectory. (2) Degrowth, if reductions of resource use or emissions were given priority over GDP growth. (3) Others, e.g. if the role of energy for GDP growth was analyzed without reference to climate change mitigation. We conclude that large rapid absolute reductions of resource use and GHG emissions cannot be achieved through observed decoupling rates, hence decoupling needs to be complemented by sufficiency-oriented strategies and strict enforcement of absolute reduction targets. More research is needed on interdependencies between wellbeing, resources and emissions.
AB - Strategies toward ambitious climate targets usually rely on the concept of 'decoupling'; that is, they aim at promoting economic growth while reducing the use of natural resources and GHG emissions. GDP growth coinciding with absolute reductions in emissions or resource use is denoted as 'absolute decoupling', as opposed to 'relative decoupling', where resource use or emissions increase less so than does GDP. Based on the bibliometric mapping in part I (Wiedenhofer et al, 2020 Environ. Res. Lett. 15 063002), we synthesize the evidence emerging from the selected 835 peer-reviewed articles. We evaluate empirical studies of decoupling related to final/useful energy, exergy, use of material resources, as well as CO2 and total GHG emissions. We find that relative decoupling is frequent for material use as well as GHG and CO2 emissions but not for useful exergy, a quality-based measure of energy use. Primary energy can be decoupled from GDP largely to the extent to which the conversion of primary energy to useful exergy is improved. Examples of absolute long-term decoupling are rare, but recently some industrialized countries have decoupled GDP from both production- A nd, weaklier, consumption-based CO2 emissions. We analyze policies or strategies in the decoupling literature by classifying them into three groups: (1) Green growth, if sufficient reductions of resource use or emissions were deemed possible without altering the growth trajectory. (2) Degrowth, if reductions of resource use or emissions were given priority over GDP growth. (3) Others, e.g. if the role of energy for GDP growth was analyzed without reference to climate change mitigation. We conclude that large rapid absolute reductions of resource use and GHG emissions cannot be achieved through observed decoupling rates, hence decoupling needs to be complemented by sufficiency-oriented strategies and strict enforcement of absolute reduction targets. More research is needed on interdependencies between wellbeing, resources and emissions.
KW - GHG emissions
KW - decoupling
KW - degrowth
KW - economic growth
KW - energy
KW - exergy
KW - material flow
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086596345&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a
DO - 10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a
M3 - Review Article
AN - SCOPUS:85086596345
SN - 1748-9318
VL - 15
JO - Environmental Research Letters
JF - Environmental Research Letters
IS - 6
M1 - 065003
ER -