Abstract (may include machine translation)
That matters of the state must always be resolved before democratization seems to be a fairly common position in the scholarly literature. There are, however, also scholars that stress the importance of an alternative perspective: ‘no democracy, no state’. This article seeks to contribute to a better understanding of this very important issue, advocating the need for a more nuanced argument about the relationship between the state and democracy. To do so, Croatia and Serbia serve as empirical examples as their different outcomes regarding the consolidation of democracy are explained as due to their (un)resolved stateness problem. The article uses process tracing to explain these outcomes and attempts to craft a minimally sufficient explanation of the outcomes by developing causal mechanisms.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 369-387 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Southeast European and Black Sea Studies |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Croatia
- Serbia
- Stateness
- Consolidation of democracy
- Nationalism
- War
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A painful break or agony without end? The stateness problem and its influence on democratization in Croatia and Serbia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver