TY - JOUR
T1 - A Humanoid Robot s Effortful Adaptation Boosts Partners' Commitment to an Interactive Teaching Task
AU - Vignolo, Alessia
AU - Powell, Henry
AU - Rea, Francesco
AU - Sciutti, Alessandra
AU - McEllin, Luke
AU - Michael, John
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - We tested the hypothesis that, if a robot apparently invests effort in teaching a new skill to a human participant, the human participant will reciprocate by investing more effort in teaching the robot a new skill, too. To this end, we devised a scenario in which the iCub and a human participant alternated in teaching each other new skills. In the Adaptive condition of the robot teaching phase, the iCub slowed down its movements when repeating a demonstration for the human learner, whereas in the Unadaptive condition it sped the movements up when repeating the demonstration. In a subsequent participant teaching phase, human participants were asked to give the iCub a demonstration, and then to repeat it if the iCub had not understood. We predicted that in the Adaptive condition, participants would reciprocate the iCub's adaptivity by investing more effort to slow down their movements and to increase segmentation when repeating their demonstration. The results showed that this was true when participants experienced the Adaptive condition after the Unadaptive condition and not when the order was inverted, indicating that participants were particularly sensitive to the changes in the iCub's level of commitment over the course of the experiment.
AB - We tested the hypothesis that, if a robot apparently invests effort in teaching a new skill to a human participant, the human participant will reciprocate by investing more effort in teaching the robot a new skill, too. To this end, we devised a scenario in which the iCub and a human participant alternated in teaching each other new skills. In the Adaptive condition of the robot teaching phase, the iCub slowed down its movements when repeating a demonstration for the human learner, whereas in the Unadaptive condition it sped the movements up when repeating the demonstration. In a subsequent participant teaching phase, human participants were asked to give the iCub a demonstration, and then to repeat it if the iCub had not understood. We predicted that in the Adaptive condition, participants would reciprocate the iCub's adaptivity by investing more effort to slow down their movements and to increase segmentation when repeating their demonstration. The results showed that this was true when participants experienced the Adaptive condition after the Unadaptive condition and not when the order was inverted, indicating that participants were particularly sensitive to the changes in the iCub's level of commitment over the course of the experiment.
KW - Commitment
KW - human-robot interaction
KW - kinematics
KW - movement understanding
KW - non-verbal communication
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124796956&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3481586
DO - 10.1145/3481586
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85124796956
SN - 2573-9522
VL - 11
JO - ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
JF - ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
IS - 1
M1 - 9
ER -