Abstract (may include machine translation)
A trafiktörvény határozat, amelynek gyökereit az AB eredeti, strukturálatlannak tekinthető tulajdonvédelmi gyakorlatában kell keresnünk, rögzítette azt az alkotmánybírósági gyakorlatot, amely szerint annak vizsgálatánál, hogy az állam piacszabályozási beavatkozásának milyen alapjogi korlátjai lehetnek, csaknem kizárólag az állam szabályozási indokai vagy érdekei bírnak jelentőséggel, a jogalanyok helyzete, illetve annak megváltozása, a klasszikus alapjogvédelmi szempontok háttérbe szorulnak. A határozat az alkotmányos tulajdonvédelem, illetve a vállalkozás szabadsága védelmi körét jelentősen szűkítette az állam piacszabályozási beavatkozásával szemben olyan esetekben is, amikor a szabályozás – a piaci szereplők viszonylag jelentős számát érintve – lényegesen átrendezte a piaci viszonyokat és azzal párhuzamosan az érintett jogalanyok piaci lehetőségeit, életkörülményeit is. Ezzel az állam kivételes helyét és szerepét is nyilvánvalóvá tette a magyar piacgazdaságban, méghozzá az annak működésében alapvető szerepet játszó, alkotmányosan is védett egyéni szabadságok és jogosultságok újradefiniálásával.
The decision on the Tobacco shop regulation, the roots of which can be found in the original, unstructured property protection practice of the Constitutional Court, recorded the practice of the Constitutional Court, according to which the state's regulatory reasons or interests are almost exclusively relevant in the examination of the fundamental rights limits of the state's intervention in market regulation, the situation of the legal entities and its changes, and the classical fundamental rights protection aspects are pushed into the background. The decision has significantly narrowed the scope of protection of constitutional property rights and the freedom to conduct a business in contrast to the intervention of the state in market regulation, even in cases where the regulation - affecting a relatively large number of market participants - has substantially reorganised market relations and, at the same time, the market opportunities and living conditions of the legal entities concerned. In this way, the exceptional place and role of the state in the Hungarian market economy has been made clear, by redefining the constitutionally protected individual freedoms and entitlements that play a fundamental role in its functioning.
The decision on the Tobacco shop regulation, the roots of which can be found in the original, unstructured property protection practice of the Constitutional Court, recorded the practice of the Constitutional Court, according to which the state's regulatory reasons or interests are almost exclusively relevant in the examination of the fundamental rights limits of the state's intervention in market regulation, the situation of the legal entities and its changes, and the classical fundamental rights protection aspects are pushed into the background. The decision has significantly narrowed the scope of protection of constitutional property rights and the freedom to conduct a business in contrast to the intervention of the state in market regulation, even in cases where the regulation - affecting a relatively large number of market participants - has substantially reorganised market relations and, at the same time, the market opportunities and living conditions of the legal entities concerned. In this way, the exceptional place and role of the state in the Hungarian market economy has been made clear, by redefining the constitutionally protected individual freedoms and entitlements that play a fundamental role in its functioning.
Translated title of the contribution | Decision 3194/2014 (VII.15.) Constitutional Court - Tobacco shop regulation |
---|---|
Original language | Hungarian |
Title of host publication | Az Alkotmánybírósági gyakorlat |
Editors | Fruzsina Gárdos-Orosz, Kinga Zakariás |
Place of Publication | Budapest |
Publisher | HVG-ORAC |
Pages | 531-558 |
Number of pages | 28 |
ISBN (Print) | 9789632585444 |
State | Published - 2021 |